Discipline Maturity Lifecycle: History Data-Point
March 1, 2012 1 Comment
Yesterday during my drive home, after listening to an interesting Enterprise Architecture and Strategy presentation, another data-point that all the design disciplines mature in similar manner came to mind. One of the current enterprise architecture trends beyond the usual economic pressures and cloud is enabling enterprise agility.
Enterprise Agility is having the flexibility to change how the organization operates, the services it provides or uses quickly. This comes at a price. However, as the product industries as automotive discovered, this cost was minimal compared to the competitive advantage flexibility created.
One only has to look at the history of competition between Toyota and GM during the seventies. Doctors Ohno and Shigeo, developed the Toyota production system which was exactly counter to the prevailing wisdom of the day to use economic order quantity / economic production runs (aka Traditional Mass Production). Dr. Shingeo’s creation of flexible machining concepts –Single Minute Die Exchange- and Ohno’s JIT concepts enabled Toyota to reduce time to create and field new models. This change from industry standard seven years to five years made Toyota more responsive to the market (read that ability to adjust to the gas crisis). Suddenly American Automotive Manufacturers market share dropped and never regained its former glory.
The value of this flexibility was not lost on executives from other industries. Today, IT is now running to catch up to the other engineering disciplines on designing for flexibility, and with that the argument as to the value of such. As the IT community matures, it will come to the same conclusion as Systems Engineers, to develop the practices around supporting the –ilities and the competence to balance between these –ilities (i.e., Design of the Total Offering).